If Sarah prevails in her lawsuit against Carl, what type of legal remedy is she most likely entitled to?

If Sarah prevails in her lawsuit against Carl, she is most likely entitled to damages. Damages refer to a monetary award given to an injured party as compensation for losses incurred due to another party's actions or negligence. This form of legal remedy aims to restore the injured party to the financial position they would have been in had the harm not occurred.

In many civil cases, including personal injury, breach of contract, or tort claims, damages serve as the primary way to address the injury. They can include compensatory damages for actual losses (like medical expenses or lost wages) and, in some cases, punitive damages intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter future misconduct.

Other remedies, such as injunctions or restitution, serve different purposes. An injunction would require a party to do or refrain from doing something, while restitution seeks to restore a party to their previous position by returning property or value to the wronged party. A declaratory judgment, on the other hand, involves a court determining the rights and obligations of the parties without necessarily awarding damages. However, in the context of Sarah's lawsuit against Carl, damages are the most direct and common remedy sought to compensate her for the harm she has suffered.