What is a concurring opinion?

A concurring opinion is indeed an agreement with the majority opinion but includes additional points or reasoning that the judge wants to express separately. This type of opinion is written by a judge who agrees with the result reached by the majority of the court but has different reasons or emphasizes different aspects of the case. By articulating these additional views, a concurring opinion can add depth to the legal reasoning and may influence future cases by highlighting alternative interpretations or considerations that the majority did not fully address.

Other options do not accurately capture the essence of a concurring opinion. While a dissenting opinion reflects disagreement with the majority and is expressed by judges who do not concur with the decision, a legal opinion from a non-judicial party does not fit within the judicial context. Additionally, the notion that an opinion does not affect the final ruling misrepresents its significance; concurring opinions can help shape legal precedents and influence how cases are interpreted in the future.