What is meant by "persuasive authorities" in legal discussions?

"Persuasive authorities" refers to sources of law that courts may consider when making decisions, but are not required to follow. This distinction is important in the legal context because it highlights that judges can look to these sources for guidance or support in their decision-making processes, but they ultimately have the discretion to agree or disagree with the principles or precedents established in those sources.

For example, persuasive authorities might include opinions from courts in other jurisdictions, scholarly articles, or legal commentaries. While these sources can offer valuable insights and arguments, they do not hold the same weight as mandatory laws—such as statutes and binding precedents from higher courts—that must be adhered to. This flexibility allows courts to adopt or reject persuasive authorities based on the specific circumstances of a case, thereby fostering a more nuanced approach to legal interpretation and application.